A Doll's House by Henrik Ibsen; an In-depth Analysis

0

 


SIGNIFICANCE OF THE TITLE

The  title  of  the  play  has  immense  significance  as  it  shows  that  the  protagonist  Nora  has  never  been  treated  more  than  a  playful  thing  shifting  from   the  hands  of  one  person to  another. The  ‘Doll’  represents  Nora  and  the  ‘House’  represents  the  house  of Helmer  where  Nora  lives. If  the  play  is  observed  critically  we  can  see  that  the  title  of  doll  is used  in  a  rather  ironic  manner  suggesting  that  he  enjoys  the  beauty  of  her  wife  and  enables  her  childish  behavior  but  as  the  play  progresses  we  come  to  see  that  there  is  much  more  to  her  then  just her  feminine  side. Nora  is  a  dignified  individual  who  is  seeking  validation  and  trying  to  break  free  from  the  restrictions  imposed  on  her  by  her  husband  and  the  society  in general. According  to  her  husband  Nora  is just  an  inanimate  object  with  which  he  toys  around  as  Nora  says  in  the  play  “Our home has been nothing but a playroom. I have been your doll-wife”. This  pretty  much  sums  up  the  reality  of  their  married  life , their  picturesque home  and  Helmer’s  attitude  towards  her.  Nora  is an  apparent  doll  which  is  subservient  and  acts  as  per  the  demands  of  her  husband  who  wants  to  see  her  as  almost  perfect  and  unchanging .

This article is copy protected!                                                                               

 

 

Download Soft Copy

 

Another  ironic  reference  is  made  in  the  usage  of  the  word  ‘Doll’s’  when  the  house  is  described  because  we  can  clearly  comprehend  that  the  ‘house’  not  ‘home’  does  not  belong  to  the  Nora  the  real  owner  of  the  house  is  Mr.Helmer  along  with  the   doll. In fact  that  house  is  her  cage  where  she  is  bound  to  act  like  her  husband   wants.

The  use  of  word  ‘house’  also  indicate  towards  the  thematic  meaning. The  word house  is  used  instead  of  home  which  is  full  of  emotions. On  the  other  hand  house  only  depicts  some  place  or  shelter  to  live  in  without  any  emotions  or  feelings  of  a  family  attached  with it.

However  not  all  translators  agree on the  same  name  some  call  it  “A Doll’s House”  while  others  just  named  it  as  “A Doll House”. In  one  title  doll  is  the  possessive  of  the  house  and  in  another  it  merely  defines  what   sort  of  house  it  is.

CHRISTMAS TREE AS A SYMBOL OF NORA’S STATE

The  Christmas  tree  undoubtedly  is  full  of  symbolism  because  it  symbolizes  Nora’s  position  in  the  household  that  is  merely  decorative. She  dresses  up  the  tree  with  different  ornaments  and  decorations  as  she  does  in  her  life  to  cover  up  the  lies  and  deceits.  At  one  instance  she  tells  the  maid  to  not  let  children  see  the  tree  until  it  is  decorated  the  same  way  she  tells  Torvald  that  she  cannot  be  seen  in  her  costume  until  the  party.

There  are  many  parallels  between  the  Christmas  tree  and  Nora  as  we  know  that  at  the  beginning  of  the  act  II  the  tree  is  described  as  “The Christmas Tree is […] stripped of its ornaments and with burnt-down candle-ends on its disheveled branches”   which  depicts  that  everything  is  falling  out  of  place  and  the  obvious  beauty  of  the  tree  has  been  damaged  same  is  the  case  with  Nora  because  her  condition  is  worse  as  her  lies  begin  to  fade  and  truth  of  her  fraud  is  about  to  her  emerge.  Nora’s  condition  has  also  been  explained  in  the  same  way  that  “[Nora] is alone in the room, walking about uneasily”  which  suggests  that  her  physical  as  well  as  psychological  condition  is  battered.

POTRAYAL OF NORA’S TARANTELLA DANCE

We know that Norma constantly tries to please her husband b doing different stunts and by dressing up like a doll one such instant is when she rehearses for the tarantella dance that she prepared for her husband. It is shown that during the practice she wears a colorful shawl which spills the enthusiasm of life and energy which her husband disapproves but by the time she has her last dances she is so caught up in the whirl of life that her costume changes to a black colored shawl which is the color of apathy and death and sorrow. Her dance is wild and full of chaos and hysteric movements which her husband does not know anything about because the fear of her lie being revealed is stinging Nora. Her dance casts an arousing mood upon Torvald and he could not hold himself and wanted to get intimate with her wife. Nora being in her worries rejects him which he obviously does not take very well.

Nora: “leave me Torvald! Get away from me I don’t want all this.”
Torvald: “what? Now Nora you’re joking with me. Don’t want __? Aren’t I your husband?”

Torvald wants Nora to adheres to society’s demands of a good wife as well as comply with his orders anywhere and anytime he wants. The tarantella dance which was originated from the moves of a person who was bitten by a poisonous spider also symbolizes her mood and frenzy. She frantically dances as a reaction to the blackmailing of krogstad who poisoned her life and to the smothering oppression of her husband in the name of love.

OTHER SYMBOLS AND METAPHORS EXPLAINED

Starting from the setting of the play, it is one of the most vital symbols in the ply s the play progresses in the end of the year is approaching. There are many significant events that are celebrated at that time i.e. the Christmas and the dawn of the New Year. The play symbolizes the ending of the old and the birth of the new as many people change their lives with the changing year for example krogstad changes his behavior and decides to give his life another chance with Mrs. Linde, Torvald discovers that he has been lied to by his wife and changes from being a lover husband to a judgmental demeaning one. Similarly Nora has spiritual awakening as well and realizes her worth and walks out of the house and her pitiful marriage because she wants to be more than a “doll-wife”.

Another symbol which is prominent throughout the play is the stove. The stove makes fire which provides warmth and heat. Nora goes and touches the stove when she talks with krogstad and tries to protect herself against the icy cold situation she is facing. Again at the instance when Dr. Rank declares his love for Nora she walks over to the stove without any clear purpose of doing so which depicts that she somehow feels safe in the warmth of this object whenever something bothers or bewildered her.

Another symbolic action that we find in the end of the play is that of Nora shutting the door of Helmer’s house and stepping outside. This is not the mere act of ending the marriage or leaving his home but caters much more than that. It shows that she left her old self behind and is ready to live life on her own terms she is breaking the shackles made by her husband and accepting her role as a conscious wise and free woman. This also refers to the modern woman’s step towards gaining independence, free will and facing hurdles on her own. That is why Ibsen’s play is called a modern play.

MOTIVES BEHIND NORA’S LYING

Nora lies to her husband about number of things be it little things like macaroons or the critical matter of financial fraud. If we talk about Nora’s stance about her wrongdoings she simply denies the fact that she has committed a crime. She forged the sign of her late father to sanction a loan in which she is not alone. What she doesn’t realize is that she has been morally corrupt on various levels. Krogstad, her accomplice however accepts his mistakes and now faces the criminal charges and wants Nora to do the same. She on the other hand stands firm on the ground that she did all she did with the best of intentions. Nora after rejecting her husband’s apologies and pleads in the end decides to leave the doll house and their deceptive marriage.

If we talk about the reason to why Nora lied to her husband there are a number of facts. First off the biggest reason one can simply conclude by reading the play is that she did out of love for her husband. She courageously committed a fraud to save her husband when Dr suggested her to take Torvald to Italy. Initially nor tried her best to convince Torvald to burrow some money to go to Italy but he refuses as a result she takes this huge daring step on her own. Knowing her husband and his temper Nora is unable to tell him the truth of the finance so she keeps hiding it because she feared Helmer’s reaction.

If we take the instance of Nora lying about the macaroons that too is justified somehow because she is caged in the so called house she shares with her husband. She cannot even fulfill her simplest wish of eating something she desires without the approval of her controlling husband. Nora’s childlike behavior is n instinctive response to her husband’s demeaning behavior.  We can say that her capacity of deception is not limited.

TORVALD’S REACTION AND HIS TAKE ON BEING CHEATED

Torvald was more than angry when he finds about all the matters going on. He feels deceived, cheated and insulted. The cause of his anger is justified within the context of social norms which a wife should follow i.e. consulting her husband before making such a huge decision. Nora despite having good intentions in her heart breaks the basic and far most important rule of spousal relationship that is trust. As soon as Torvald got to know about Nora’s lies he immediately denounce her as being her wife and bashed her. He cannot bring himself to show gratitude towards Nora for saving his life instead he becomes offensive and concerned for his own reputation. This leads us to think that all of this may had hurt his ego and patriarchal dominance.

In a deeper sense we can see that why Torvald felt so fumed up because whatever Nora did behind his back involved krogstad who is fraudulent and does not have a good reputation. Torvald is worried that krogstad may destroy his repute with all the blackmailing also he was an insubordinate. Torvald could not digest the audacity of her wife and an ex employee that they had done something which could potentially harm his job and respect. He realizes that his standing as a man is at stake that he could not control his own wife from attempting such crime.

Torvald names his wife as “irresponsible” and shames her saying that “Now, do you understand what you've done to me!” claiming Nora had done some irreversible damage to his social status. He also degrades krogstad along with his wife.

CORRUPTION, LIES AND DECIET REFLECTED BY EACH CHARACTER

The theme of lies and deception runs throughout the play. Starting from Nora when she deceived her husband by borrowing money and then piling up lies upon lies to protect her husband or to some extent her own self. She keeps fabricating little things like eating macaroons or tiptoeing around her husband to hear him. She idealized her father in her childhood and soon realized that she was wrong and then lovingly makes her husband her ideal. To some extent Nora knows that her husband is just controlling her and wants her as he wishes to see her but she continues to live in that fancy world that she created around herself. She even urges her children to tell lie when she says “Don't talk to anyone about the strange gentleman. You hear? Not even to Daddy”. In this way she is giving way their purity and teaching them to scam their way out of difficulties. This does indicate the unhealthy ritual of lying and deceit in their family.

If we observe the behavior of Torvald we can see that he is maneuvering his wife according to his needs and wishes. He does not truly love her as their marriage failed the test. He is manipulative and lies about his undying love and sacrificing his life for Nora.

Similarly Dr. Rank who is the family doctor lies and keeps his true feelings about Nora under the cover. On one side he tries to be a good friend to Torvald by keeping his feelings hidden on the same hand he cannot restrict himself from confessing his love in front of Nora.

Ever character seem to struggle with appearance VS reality while keeping up with that masked identities and lying to each other intentionally or unintentionally. Whereas at the end we can say that all of them re reborn and acquire a lesson out of their mistakes.

The play is interpreted by Ayesha Imtiaz, one of the team memebers at the School of Literature.

Tags

Post a Comment

0Comments
Post a Comment (0)